4.4 Article

Forest fibre network design with multiple assortments: a case study in Newfoundland

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 1232-1243

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0504

关键词

forest biomass; value chain design; backhaul transportation; sorting yards; integrated strategic and tactical planning

类别

资金

  1. FORAC research consortium (Universite Laval)
  2. NSERC Strategic Network on Value Chain Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Canadian forest industry is facing several challenges including high fibre cost, decline in commodity profitability, and low investment levels at relatively old manufacturing plants. To enable transformation of the industry, innovations are needed to develop value-added products and to shift to an efficient integrated value chain. In this regard, improved logistics for better handling of raw material, forest biomass utilization, and use of new technologies are some promising avenues. In this paper, we propose a generic value chain model that includes locating new sorting yards and biorefineries maximizing the overall profit of the value chain. This integrated planning problem deals with strategic decisions including investments in new facilities and technologies and tactical decisions comprising backhaul transportation and fibre flows across the value chain. To solve such a problem, we developed a mixed integer programming model to design the forest value chain network. This model is used in an industrial case study in the province of Newfoundland, Canada. We have generated and analyzed 32 scenarios evaluated on 12 predefined key performance indicators. The results show that collaboration through backhauling, common terminals, and new assortments are important opportunities to improve the profitability and efficiency of the value chain. The potential improvement over the current situation is as high as 23% considering the aforementioned actions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据