4.8 Article

Magnetically activated adhesives: towards on-demand magnetic triggering of selected polymerisation reactions

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 7758-7764

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sc03474a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Enterprise Ireland [IP/2011/0129]
  2. Henkel Ireland Operations & Research Limited
  3. EU-ITN network Mag(net)icFun [PITN-GA-2012-290248]
  4. EU [604602]
  5. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.B25.31.0002]
  6. Royal Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On-demand initiation of chemical reactions is becoming increasingly popular in many areas. The use of a magnetic field to trigger reactions is an intriguing concept, with vast potential in both research and industrial settings, though it remains a challenge as yet unsolved. Here we report the first example of on-demand magnetic activation of a polymerisation process using an anaerobic adhesive formulation as an example of this new approach toward triggering polymerisation reactions using an external magnetic field. Our strategy involves the use of a colloidal system comprising functional methacrylate ester monomers, peroxide and Cu-II-salt as polymerisation initiators and magnetic nanoparticles coated with an oxidising shell. This unique combination prevents reduction of the reactive transition metal (Cu-II) ion by the metal substrates (steel or aluminium) to be joined - hence inhibiting the redox radical initiated cationic polymerisation reaction and efficiently preventing adhesion. The polymerisation and corresponding adhesion process can be triggered by removal of the functional magnetic particles using a permanent external magnet either prior to formulation application or at the joint to be adhered, enabling the polymerisation to proceed through Cu-II-mediated reduction. This new approach enables on-demand magnetically-triggered reaction initiation and holds potential for a range of useful applications in chemistry, materials science and relevant industrial manufacturing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据