4.4 Article

An economic evaluation of the healthcare cost of tinnitus management in the UK

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2527-2

关键词

Tinnitus; Hearing aids; Cost effectiveness; Ear nose and throat; General practice; Audiology; Clinical psychology; Cognitive behaviour therapy; Hearing aids

资金

  1. NIHR biomedical research centre programme
  2. British Tinnitus Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is no standard treatment pathway for tinnitus patients in the UK. Possible therapies include education and reassurance, cognitive behavioural therapies, modified tinnitus retraining therapy (education and sound enrichment), or amplification of external sound using hearing aids. However, the effectiveness of most therapies is somewhat controversial. As health services come under economic pressure to deploy resources more effectively there is an increasing need to demonstrate the value of tinnitus therapies, and how value may be continuously enhanced. The objective of this project was to map out existing clinical practice, estimate the NHS costs associated with the management approaches used, and obtain initial indicative estimates of cost-effectiveness. Methods: Current treatment pathways, costs and health outcomes were determined from the tinnitus literature, national statistics, a patient survey, and expert opinion. These were used to create an Excel-based economic model of therapy options for tinnitus patients. The probabilities associated with the likelihood of an individual patient receiving a particular combination of therapies was used to calculate the average cost of treatment per patient, average health outcome per patient measured in QALYs gained, and cost-effectiveness, measured by the average cost per QALY gained. Results: The average cost of tinnitus treatment per patient per year is GB 717 pound, equating to an NHS healthcare bill of GB 750 pound million per year. Across all pathways, tinnitus therapy costs pound 10,600 per QALY gained. Results were relatively insensitive to restrictions on access to cognitive behaviour therapy, and a subsequent reliance on other therapies. Conclusions: NHS provisions for tinnitus are cost-effective against the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effective threshold. Most interventions help, but education alone offers very small QALY gains. The most cost-effective therapies in the model were delivered within audiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据