4.6 Article

Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 43-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.05.015

关键词

aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement; valvular heart disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the natural history and optimal timing of surgery in elderly patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND AS is increasingly diagnosed in an aging population, and large numbers of elderly patients are undergoing aortic valve procedures. However, the average age of patients represented in most natural history studies on AS is between 60 and 70 years. METHODS A total of 103 consecutive patients >70 years of age (51 female; mean age 77 +/- 5 years) with asymptomatic severe AS (peak aortic jet velocity [AV-Vet] 4.7 +/- 0.6 m/s) were prospectively followed. RESULTS During follow-up, 91 events occurred, including an indication for aortic valve replacement in 82 patients and cardiac deaths in 9, respectively. Event-free survival was 73%, 43%, 23%, and 16% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Physical mobility was impaired in 29% of the patients, and symptom onset was severe (New York Heart Association functional class >= III) in 43% of those who developed symptoms. Patients with AV-Vel >= 5.0 m/s had event-free survival rates of 21% and 6% at 2 and 4 years, respectively, compared with 57% and 23% for patients with AV-Vel <5.0 m/s (p < 0.001). Seventy-one patients underwent aortic valve replacement, and post-operative survival was 89% and 77% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In elderly patients with severe but asymptomatic AS, mild symptoms may be difficult to detect, particularly when mobility is impaired and severe symptom onset is common, warranting close clinical follow-up. Furthermore, a very high event rate can be expected, and cardiac deaths are not infrequent. Thus, elective aortic valve procedures may be considered in selected elderly patients at low procedural risk. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据