3.8 Proceedings Paper

Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Single- and Dual-Material 3D Printed Products

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.076

关键词

dual material 3D printing; FDM; tensile strength; orientation angle; infill rate; material type

资金

  1. SW fusion technology upgrading (R&D) for new industry creation [S0177-16-1002]
  2. regional industry manpower fostering project of Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea [2016H1D5A1910285]
  3. technology innovation project of Small and Medium Business Administration [S2439592]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016H1D5A1910285] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent increase in application of Additive Manufacturing ( AM) products has resulted in new demands throughout the industry. Although FDM-based products are used in various fields, the mechanical properties of such products still tend to be weaker than that of the products manufactured through conventional manufacturing processes. Therefore, improving the mechanical properties of FDM-printed products is a key factor that can greatly contribute to the manufacturing industry. In this study, tensile tests are conducted on a single material specimen to analyze the influence of various experiment variables that may add up to the enhancement of the mechanical properties of 3D printed products. Additional experiments are conducted with respect to the structural arrangement and material ratio of dual material 3D printing in order to investigate the effectiveness of dual material printed products. Studies on improving such mechanical properties are expected to contribute to the enhancement of the strength for single material printed products, and provide some guidance when manufacturing dual material printed products by considering the optimum efficiency of each material. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据