4.2 Article

Turning a rock shelter into a home. Neanderthal use of space in Abric Romani levels M and O

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 743-766

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2017.1340470

关键词

Neanderthal behaviour; intra-site spatial analysis; faunal refits; zooarchaeology; taphonomy; Abric Romani

资金

  1. project Abric Romani - Cinglera del Capello - Generalitat de Catalunya [2014/100576]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014/100573, 2014 SGR 900]
  3. Seneca Foundation [19434/PI/14]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO/FEDER) [CGL2015-65387-C3-1-P, CGL2016-80000-P]
  5. Fondation Fyssen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone refits can be a useful tool to understand the archaeological assemblages. From a taphonomic point of view, they have been used to reinforce some aspects related to the formation processes of the sites. However, they can be used to check some palaeoeconomic and social interpretations of the assemblages as well, providing accurate temporal relationships between the objects. For all these reasons, bone refits are relevant to study the settlement dynamics and the intra-site behaviour of past human groups. The main aim of this work is to present the faunal refits data obtained from two different archaeological assemblages (M and O) of the Abric Romani site (Capellades, Spain), dated around 55ka. The study also includes taxonomic, anatomical, taphonomic and spatial analyses. The spatio-temporal proxy allows us to interpret the activities carried out by the Neanderthal groups in different areas during different moments. From here, it is possible to interpret site structure, using ethnoarchaeological data as a referent. The comparison between these two archaeological layers, and between them and other assemblages, both from Abric Romani and from other sites, can contribute significantly to the knowledge of the intra-site behaviour and settlement patterns at the end of the Middle Palaeolithic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据