4.8 Article

In Situ Capture of Bacterial Toxins for Antivirulence Vaccination

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 33, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201701644

关键词

antibiotic-resistant bacteria; antivirulence therapies; biomimetic nanoparticles; nanomedicine; vaccinations

资金

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense [HDTRA1-14-1-0064]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01EY025947]
  3. NIH-NCI [CCSG: P30 014195]
  4. NINDS Neuroscience Core Grant
  5. Waitt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antivirulence vaccination is a promising strategy for addressing bacterial infection that focuses on removing the harmful toxins produced by bacteria. However, a major challenge for creating vaccines against biological toxins is that the vaccine potency is often limited by lack of antigenic breadth, as most formulations have focused on single antigens, while most bacteria secrete a plethora of toxins. Here, a facile approach for generating multiantigenic nanotoxoids for use as vaccines against pathogenic bacteria by leveraging the natural affinity of virulence factors for cellular membranes is reported. Specifically, multiple virulent toxins from bacterial protein secretions are concurrently and naturally entrapped using a membrane-coated nanosponge construct. The resulting multivalent nanotoxoids are capable of delivering virulence factors together, are safe both in vitro and in vivo, and can elicit functional immunity capable of combating live bacterial infections in a mouse model. Despite containing the same bacterial antigens, the reported nanotoxoid formulation consistently outperforms a denatured protein preparation in all of the metrics studied, which underscores the utility of biomimetic nanoparticle-based neutralization and delivery. Overall this strategy helps to address major hurdles in the design of antivirulence vaccines, enabling increased antigenic breadth while maintaining safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据