4.7 Article

Nitric oxide sensing by chlorophyll a

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 985, 期 -, 页码 101-113

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.026

关键词

Chlorophylla (Chla); Nitric oxide (NO); Nitrite (NO2-); S-Nitroso-glutathione (SNO); Near infra-red fluorescence (NIRF); Cyanobacteria

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India [BT/PR3957/NNT/28/659/2013]
  2. Department of Science and Technology Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) [PDF/2015/001079/LS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide (NO) acts as a signalling molecule that has direct and indirect regulatory roles in various functional processes in biology, though in plant kingdomits role is relatively unexplored. One reason for this is the fact that sensing of NO is always challenging. There are very few probes that can classify the different NO species. The present paper proposes a simple but straightforward way for sensing different NO species using chlorophyll, the source of inspiration being hemoglobin that serves as NO sink in mammalian systems. The proposed method is able to classify NO from DETA-NONOate or (Z)-1-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) amino] diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate, nitrite, nitrate and S-nitrosothiol or SNO. This discrimination is carried out by chlorophyll a (chl a) at nano molar (nM) order of sensitivity and at 293 K-310 K. Molecular docking reveals the differential binding effects of NO and SNO with chlorophyll, the predicted binding affinity matching with the experimental observation. Additional experiments with a diverse range of cyanobacteria reveal that apart from the spectroscopic approach the proposed sensing module can be used in microscopic inspection of NO species. Binding of NO is sensitive to temperature and static magnetic field. This provides additional support for the involvement of the porphyrin ring structures to the NO sensing process. This also, broadens the scope of the sensing methods as hinted in the text. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据