4.8 Review

Action spectra in semiconductor photocatalysis

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 46, 期 16, 页码 4877-4894

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00136c

关键词

-

资金

  1. DGIST R&D Program of Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea [17-NT-02]
  2. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [17-NT-02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Action spectra are an increasingly important part of semiconductor photocatalyst research, and comprise a plot of photonic efficiency, eta, versus excitation wavelength, lambda. The features and theory behind an ideal photocatalytic system are discussed, and used to identify: (i) the key aspect of an ideal action spectrum, namely: it is a plot of eta vs. lambda which has the same shape as that of the fraction of radiation absorbed by the semiconductor photocatalyst, f, versus lambda and (ii) the key requirement when running an action spectrum, namely, that the initial rate of the photocatalytic process is directly proportional to incident photon flux, rho, at wavelengths where eta > 0. The Pt/TiO2/MeOH system is highlighted as an example of a photosystem that yields an ideal action spectrum. Most photocatalytic systems exhibit non-ideal action spectra, mostly due to one or more of the following: light intensity effects, crystal phase effects, dye-sensitisation, dye photolysis, charge transfer complex, CTC, formation and localized surface plasmon radiation, LSPR, absorption by a deposited noble metal catalyst. Each of these effects is illustrated using examples taken from the literatures and discussed. A suggested typical protocol for recording the action spectrum and absorption/diffuse reflectance spectrum of a photocatalytic system is described. The dangers of using a dye to probe the activity of a photocatalysts are also discussed, and a possible way to avoid this, via reductive photocatalysis, is suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据