4.5 Article

High expression of CPNE3 predicts adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 108, 期 9, 页码 1850-1857

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13311

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; CPNE3; expression; predicts; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81500118, 61501519]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600443]
  3. PLAGH Project of Medical Big Data [2016-MBD-025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CPNE3, a member of a Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding protein family, was identified as a ligand of ERBB2 and has a more general role in carcinogenesis. Here, we identified the prognostic significance of CPNE3 expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients based on two datasets. In the first microarray dataset (n = 272), compared to low CPNE3 expression (CPNE3(low)), high CPNE3 expression (CPNE3(high)) was associated with adverse overall survival (OS, P < 0.001) and event-free survival (EFS, P < 0.001). In the second independent group of AML patients (TCGA dataset, n = 179), CPNE3(high) was also associated with adverse OS and EFS (OS, P = 0.01; EFS, P = 0.036). Notably, among CPNE3(high) patients, those received allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) had longer OS and EFS than those with chemotherapy alone (allogeneic HCT, n = 40 vs chemotherapy, n = 46), but treatment modules played an insignificant role in the survival of CPNE3(low) patients (allogeneic HCT, n = 32 vs chemotherapy, n = 54). These results indicated that CPNE3(high) is an independent, adverse prognostic factor in AML and might guide treatment decisions towards allogeneic HCT. To understand its inherent mechanisms, we investigated genome-wide gene/microRNA expression signatures and cell signaling pathways associated with CPNE3 expression. In conclusion, CPNE3(high) is an adverse prognostic biomarker for AML. Its effect may be attributed to the distinctive genome-wide gene/microRNA expression and related cell signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据