4.5 Article

Feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination for hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to locoregional therapies

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 108, 期 9, 页码 1732-1738

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13301

关键词

Cancer immunotherapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune response; overall survival; personalized peptide vaccine

类别

资金

  1. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07229] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to locoregional therapy is dismal, even following treatment with sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor. To develop a more efficacious treatment, we undertook a feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for HCC, in which the peptides were selected from 31 peptide candidates based on the pre-existing immunity. Twenty-six HCC patients refractory to locoregional therapies (cohort 1) and 30 patients refractory to both locoregional and systemic therapies (cohort 2) were entered into the study. There were no severe adverse events related to PPV except for one injection site reaction. At the end of the first cycle of six vaccinations, successful CTL or IgG boosting was observed in 57% or 46% of patients in cohort 1 and in 54% or 52% of patients in cohort 2, respectively. Successful IgG boosting at the end of the second cycle was observed in the majority of patients tested. Median overall survival was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 12.2-22.5 months) in cohort 1, and 8.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-12.2 months) in cohort 2. Based on the higher rates of immune boosting and the safety profile of PPV, further clinical studies of PPV would be warranted for patients with HCC refractory to not only locoregional therapy but also both locoregional and systemic therapies. The protocol of this study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000001882 and UMIN000003590).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据