4.5 Article

Writer identification using intra-stroke and inter-stroke information for security enhancements in P2P systems

期刊

PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 1166-1175

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12083-017-0606-0

关键词

Writer identification; Intra-stroke and inter-stroke information; Chinese character; User authentication; P2P

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K00242] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese language has enormous number of characters and complicated stroke structures. So it is very difficult to efficiently and accurately identify a Chinese writer from his/her handwritings. This paper proposes a novel writer identification method for Chinese characters commonly used in Japan which can be used in peer-to-peer (P2P) systems. As a preliminary task, we have analyzed the shapes of strokes and the types of block division structures in Chinese characters and selected some characters for writer identification. The method consists of two efficient algorithms, i.e. the Hidden-feature analysis and the Block-type model, which respectively utilize intra-stroke and inter-stroke features of handwritings to enhance the writer identification accuracy. The Hidden-feature analysis makes template classes of reference characters with online features of training samples such as pen-pressure, pen-speed, pen-altitude, and pen-azimuth of each stroke. The Block-type model also creates such classes for writer identification based on offline features, i.e. the positional information about blocks of sample characters. The experimental results show that the Hidden-feature analysis requires eight Chinese characters while the Block-type model requires only four characters and four ones to achieve writer identification accuracy over 98%. Additionally, the results also demonstrate that any eight Chinese characters are enough to achieve an identification accuracy over 99.9% when the combination of the two algorithms is applied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据