4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Improving removal of 4-chlorophenol using a TiO2 photocatalytic system with microwave and ultraviolet radiation

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 15-22

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.023

关键词

Photocatalyst; Microwave; 4-Chlorophenol; Reaction rate constant; Degradation mechanism; Titanium dioxide

资金

  1. NanoMaterial Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016M3A7B4908162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A conventional photocatalytic system is a viable tool to purify wastewaters, whereas poor degradation performance due to diverse pollutants under various conditions still leaves it behind commercial markets. This study aimed to determine the degradation efficiency and mechanism of 4-chlorophenol in a hybrid system integrating a series of unit processes such as a conventional TiO2 photocatalytic reactor as well as microwave and ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The decomposition (rate) of 4-chlorophenol was assessed with respect to the microwave intensity, pH, circulating fluid velocity, hydrogen peroxide level, and oxygen gas injection, along with a mix of individual processes. Results showed that there were favorable conditions for improving the degradation performance within certain limits. However, a significant synergy effect was also observed in the combined processes, which was substantially larger than any single process. Out of them, the best degradation performance was achieved using microwave irradiation and hydrogen peroxide in the photocatalytic reactor. The four intermediates (i.e., benzoquinone, hydroquinone, 4-chlorocatechol, and hydroxyhydroquinone) appeared to be generated through hydroxyl radicals-mediated hydroxylation and dechlorination in the proposed photocatalytic pathway. The present research is expected to provide new insights into designing the high performance photocatalytic system with affordable cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据