4.7 Article

Early Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as Marker of Therapeutic Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (PLACOL Study)

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 18, 页码 5416-5425

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3155

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. Universite Paris-Descartes
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCA) [2009-1-RT-03-US-1, 2009-RT-03-UP5-1]
  6. Association pour la recherche contre le cancer (ARC) [SL220100601375]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR Nanobiotechnologies) [ANR-10-NANO-0002-09]
  8. SIRIC CARPEM
  9. ligue nationale contre le cancer (LNCC) [EL2016.LNCC/VaT]
  10. Fondation Servier
  11. Advanced Merieux Research Grant
  12. canceropole [2011-1-LABEL-UP5-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Markers of chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are essential for optimization of treatment strategies. We evaluated the applicability of early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of therapeutic efficacy. Experimental Design: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with mCRC receiving a first-or second-line chemotherapy. CtDNA was assessed in plasma collected before the first (C-0), second (C-1) and/or third (C-2) chemotherapy cycle, using picodroplet-digital PCR assays based either on detection of gene mutation (KRAS, BRAF, TP53) or hypermethylation (WIF1, NPY). CT scans were centrally assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Multivariate analyseswere adjusted on age, gender, ECOG performance status (PS), metastatic synchronicity, and treatment line. Results: Eighty-two patients with mCRC treated in first(82.9%) or second-(17.1%) line chemotherapy were included. Patients with a high (> 10 ng/mL) versus low (<= 0.1 ng/mL) ctDNA concentration at C0 had a shorter overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs. 33.4 months: adjusted HR, 5.64; 95% CI, 2.5-12.6; P < 0.0001). By analyzing the evolution of the ctDNA concentration between C-0 and C-2 or C-1 (C-2or1), we classified the patients in two groups (named good or bad ctDNA responders). In multivariate analysis, patients belonging to the group called good ctDNA responder (n = 58) versus bad ctDNA responder (n = 15) had a better objective response rate (P < 0.001), and a longer median progression-free survival (8.5 vs. 2.4 months: HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.40; P < 0.0001) and OS (27.1 vs. 11.2 months: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study suggests that early change in ctDNA concentration is a marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with mCRC. (C) 2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据