4.6 Article

Hybrid solvation models for bulk, interface, and membrane: Reference interaction site methods coupled with density functional theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 96, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115429

关键词

-

资金

  1. R&D Initiative for scientific innovation of new generation batteries 2 Project (RISING 2)
  2. ultra-high-throughput design and prototyping technology for ultra-advanced materials development Project [P16010]
  3. MEXT Projects of Priority Issue on Post-K computer (development of new fundamental technologies for high-efficiency energy creation, conversion/storage, and use)
  4. Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present two hybrid solvation models for the calculation of the solvation structure with model 1 in a confined nanospace in bulk materials and model 2 at solid/liquid interfaces where an electrode is in contact with an electrolyte and a membrane is immersed into a solution. The hybrid theory is based on the reference interaction site method (RISM) for the solvent region. The electronic structure of a bulk material, an electrode, and a membrane is treated by density functional theory with the plane-wave basis and pseudopotentials technique. For model 1, we use the three-dimensional RISM (3D-RISM) by imposing a 3D periodic boundary condition on the system. However, for model 2, we reformulate the RISM by means of a two-dimensional boundary condition parallel to the surface and an open boundary condition normal to the surface. Four benchmark calculations are performed for the formaldehyde-water system, water packed into a zeolite framework, a NaCl solution in contact with an Al electrode, and an Al thin film immersed in a NaCl solution with different concentrations. The calculations are shown to be efficient and stable. Because of the flexibility of the RISM theory, the models are considered to be applicable to a wide range of solid/liquid interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据