4.5 Article

Bisphenol A induced apoptosis and transcriptome differences of spermatogonial stem cells in vitro

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 780-791

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/abbs/gmx075

关键词

spermatogonial stem cell; bisphenol A; RNA-Seq; cell viability; apoptosis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB967401, 2013CB967404]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81370675, 81421061]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medicine-Engineering Fund [YG2014ZD04, YG2014ZD08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenol A (BPA) is widely used as an industrial plasticizer, which is also an endocrine disruptor and considered to have adverse effects on reproduction. In male mammals, the long-term production of billions of spermatozoa relies on the regulated proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). However, little is known about the effects of BPA on the viability of SSCs. To investigate the influence of BPA exposure on SSCs in vitro, we isolated SSCs from mouse and successfully established in vitro propagation of SSCs. After BPA treatment, we found that BPA reduced the viability of SSCs and induced SSC apoptosis. For revealing the transcriptome differences of the BPA-treated SSCs, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing and found that 860 genes were differentially expressed among 18,272 observed genes. The gene ontology (GO) terms, regulation of programmed cell death and apoptotic process, were enriched in the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Among the cluster of DEGs associated with the kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) apoptosis pathway, activating transcription factor 4 (Atf4) and DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (Ddit3) genes were significantly up-regulated in BPA-treated SSCs, which were proved by qPCR. Taken together, these findings suggest that BPA can increase the mRNA expression of pro-apoptosis genes and reduce the viability of SSCs by inducing apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据