4.6 Review

Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) Vaccines in the Context of Current Molecular Epidemiology

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/v9050099

关键词

PCV2; epidemiology; pigs; vaccination

类别

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Grant [BB/J004324/1, BBS/E/D/20241864]
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20002173, BBS/E/D/20231762, BBS/E/D/20002174, BBS/E/D/20241864] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is an economically important swine pathogen and, although small, it has the highest evolution rate among DNA viruses. Since the discovery of PCV2 in the late 1990s, this minimalistic virus with a 1.7 kb single-stranded DNA genome and two indispensable genes has become one of the most important porcine pathogens, and presently is subjected to the highest volume of prophylactic intervention in the form of vaccines in global swine production. PCV2 can currently be divided into five different genotypes, PCV2a through PCV2e. It is well documented that PCV2 continues to evolve, which is reflected by changes in the prevalence of genotypes. During 2006, commercial vaccines for PCV2 were introduced on a large scale in a pig population mainly infected with PCV2b. Since 2012, the PCV2d genotype has essentially replaced the previously predominant PCV2b genotype in North America and similar trends are also documented in other geographic regions such as China and South Korea. This is the second major PCV2 genotype shift since the discovery of the virus. The potential increase in virulence of the emergent PCV2 genotype and the efficacy of the current vaccines derived from PCV2a genotype against the PCV2d genotype viruses has received considerable attention. This review attempts to synthesize the understanding of PCV2 biology, experimental studies on the antigenic variability, and molecular epidemiological analysis of the evolution of PCV2 genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据