4.6 Article

Magnetic states at the surface of α-Fe2O3 thin films doped with Ti, Zn, or Sn

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 96, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094426

关键词

-

资金

  1. HZB
  2. Center for Absorption in Science at the Ministry of Aliyah and Immigrant absorption
  3. European Research Council under European Union's Seventh Framework programme/ERC [617516]
  4. Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship [659491]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [659491] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spin states at the surface of epitaxial thin films of hematite, both undoped and doped with 1% Ti, Sn, or Zn, respectively, were probed with x-ray magnetic linear dichroism (XMLD) spectroscopy. Morin transitions were observed for the undoped (T-M approximate to 200 K) and Sn-doped (T-M approximate to 300 K) cases, while Zn-and Ti-doped samples were always in the high-and low-temperature phases, respectively. In contrast to what has been reported for bulk hematite doped with the tetravalent ions Sn4+ and Ti4+, for which T-M dramatically decreases, these dopants substantially increase T-M in thin films, far exceeding the bulk values. The normalized Fe L-II-edge dichroism for T < T-M does not strongly depend on doping or temperature, except for an apparent increase of the peak amplitudes for T < 100 K. We observed magnetic field-induced inversions of the dichroism peaks. By applying a magnetic field of 6.5 T on the Ti-doped sample, a transition into the T > T-M state was achieved. The temperature dependence of the critical field for the Sn-doped sample was characterized in detail. It was demonstrated the sample-to-sample variations of the Fe L-III-edge spectra were, for the most part, determined solely by the spin orientation state. Calculations of the polarization-dependent spectra based on a spin-multiplet model were in reasonable agreement with the experiment and showed a mixed excitation character of the peak structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据