4.8 Article

Targeted Delivery System Based on Gemcitabine-Loaded Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles for Lung Cancer Therapy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 37, 页码 31600-31611

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b10408

关键词

silk fibroin; gemcitabine; SP5-52 peptide; lung tumor induction; Lewis lung carcinoma cells

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation [93001053]
  2. Tehran University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, a targeted delivery system was developed based on silk fibroin nanoparticles (SFNPs) for the systemic delivery of gemcitabine (Gem) to treat induced lung tumor in a mice model. For targeting the tumorigenic lung tissue, SP5-52 peptide was conjugated to Gem-loaded SFNPs. Different methods were used to characterize the structural and physicochemical properties of the SFNPs. The prepared nanoparticles (NPs) showed suitable characteristics in terms of size, zeta potential, morphology, and structural properties. Moreover, the targeted Gem-loaded SFNPs showed higher cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and accumulation in the lung tissue in comparison to the nontargeted SFNPs and control groups. Afterward, a mice model with induced lung tumor was developed by intratracheal injection of Lewis lung carcinoma (LL/2) cells into the lungs for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of the prepared drug delivery system. The histopathological assessments and single-photon-emission computed tomography-CT radiographs showed successful lung tumor induction. Moreover, the obtained results showed higher potential of targeted Gem-loaded SFNPs in treating induced lung tumor compared with that of the control groups. Higher survival rate, less mortality, and no sign of metastasis were also observed in those animals treated with targeted NPs based on the histological and radiological analyses. This study presented an effective anticancer drug delivery system for specific targeting of induced lung tumor that could be useful in treating malignant lung cancers in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据