4.8 Review

Lifestyle precision medicine: the next generation in type 2 diabetes prevention?

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0938-x

关键词

Review; Type 2 diabetes; Lifestyle factors; Overweight/obesity; Precision medicine; Biomarkers; Intervention; Prevention

资金

  1. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. European Research Council [CoG-2015_681742_NASCENT]
  5. Innovative Medicines Initiative (DIRECT) [115317]
  6. Innovative Medicines Initiative (RHAPSODY) [115881]
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF16OC0021020, NNF17OC0026828] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The driving force behind the current global type 2 diabetes epidemic is insulin resistance in overweight and obese individuals. Dietary factors, physical inactivity, and sedentary behaviors are the major modifiable risk factors for obesity. Nevertheless, many overweight/obese people do not develop diabetes and lifestyle interventions focused on weight loss and diabetes prevention are often ineffective. Traditionally, chronically elevated blood glucose concentrations have been the hallmark of diabetes; however, many individuals will either remain 'prediabetic' or regress to normoglycemia. Thus, there is a growing need for innovative strategies to tackle diabetes at scale. The emergence of biomarker technologies has allowed more targeted therapeutic strategies for diabetes prevention (precision medicine), though largely confined to pharmacotherapy. Unlike most drugs, lifestyle interventions often have systemic health-enhancing effects. Thus, the pursuance of lifestyle precision medicine in diabetes seems rational. Herein, we review the literature on lifestyle interventions and diabetes prevention, describing the biological systems that can be characterized at scale in human populations, linking them to lifestyle in diabetes, and consider some of the challenges impeding the clinical translation of lifestyle precision medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据