4.5 Article

Species boundaries, geographic distribution and evolutionary history of the Western Palaearctic freshwater mussels Unio (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 275-299

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx039

关键词

cryptic species; evolution; geography; phylogenetics; phylogeny; phylogeography; taxonomy

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2014-57949-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delimiting species boundaries is a fundamental yet challenging task that has been especially problematic in morphologically conserved lineages. The use of genetic markers and phylogenetic approaches has proven of paramount importance to resolve these cases. Using the genus Unio as a case study, we have analysed two mitochondrial markers, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and 16S rRNA (16S), phylogenetically and phylogeographically to explore species limits and evolutionary lineages within the group. We followed two different approaches to define species boundaries: the generalized mixed Yule coalescence model in a Bayesian framework and the Poisson tree process model. Phylogenetic relationships among species and divergence times were also assessed using relaxed molecular clock analyses. Taken together, we provide a sound systematic framework for Western Palaearctic Unio species, addressing phylogenetic relationships, and the taxonomy, biogeographic patterns and evolutionary history of this group in this region. The Unio clade from the studied area had a clear phylogenetic structure with four robust lineages that include the following species: (1) Unio durieui + Unio gibbus; (2) Unio tumidus; (3) Unio pictorum, Unio delphinus + Unio foucauldianus, Unio elongatulus, Unio mancus, Unio ravoisieri, Unio tigridis; and (4) Unio tumidi-formis + (Unio bruguierianus + (Unio crassus + Unio ionicus)). Deeper analyses, including filling gaps in distributions, should be conducted to disentangle the U. crassus, U. pictorum and U. tigridis species complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据