4.8 Article

An A-D-A Type Small-Molecule Electron Acceptor with End-Extended Conjugation for High Performance Organic Solar Cells

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 18, 页码 7908-7917

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02811

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MoST) [2014CB643502, 2016YFA0200200]
  2. NSFC [91433101, 51422304, 51373078, 91633301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new non-fullerene small molecule with an acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) structure, FDNCTF, incorporating fluorenedicyclopentathiophene as core and naphthyl-fused indanone as end groups, was designed and synthesized. Compared with the previous molecule FDICTF with the phenyl-fused indanone as the end groups, the extended pi-conjugation at the end group has only little impact on its molecular orbital energy levels, and thus, the open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of its solar cell devices has been kept high. However, its light absorption and mobility, together with the short-current density (J(sc)) and the fill factor (FF), of its devices have been all improved simultaneously. Through morphology, transient absorption, and theoretical studies, it is believed that these favorable changes are caused by (1) the appropriately enhanced molecular interaction between donor/acceptor which makes the charge separation at the interface more efficient, and (2) enhanced light absorption and more ordered packing at solid state, all due to the extended end-group conjugation of this molecule. With these, the solar cells with FDNCTF as the acceptor and a wide band gap polymer PBDB-T as the donor demonstrated a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 11.2% with an enhanced J(sc) and a maintained high V-oc, and significantly improved FF of 72.7% compared with that of the devices of FDICTF with the phenyl-fused indanone as the end groups. These results indicate that the unexplored conjugation size of the end group plays a critic role for the performance of their solar cell devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据