3.8 Article

Association of adiponectin gene polymorphisms with knee osteoarthritis

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 719-725

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i9.719

关键词

Adiponectin; ADIPOQ; Polymorphism; Knee osteoarthritis; Plasma

资金

  1. Research Chair from the National Science and Technology Development Agency
  2. 100th Anniversary Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM To investigate the possible relationship of adiponectin (ADIPOQ) gene polymorphisms, plasma adiponectin, and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS A total of 398 subjects, 202 knee OA patients and 196 healthy individuals, were enrolled in the case-control study. Genotyping at + 45T/G (rs2241766) and + 276G/T (rs1501299) loci was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Plasma adiponectin levels were assessed using enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. OA severity was determined using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. RESULTS No significant associations were observed in the genotype distributions and allele frequencies at two loci of + 45T/G and + 276G/T polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ between knee OA patients and control subjects. There was a significant association between genotype distribution of + 276G/T polymorphism and KL grade 2, 3 or 4 (P = 0.037, P = 0.046, P = 0.016, respectively). At + 45T/G locus, the percentage of GG genotype was notably greater in control subjects (13.40%) compared with OA subjects (1.70%) (P = 0.023). Plasma adiponectin was markedly decreased in OA subjects compared with control subjects (P = 0.03). Likewise, circulating adiponectin in OA subjects was notably lesser than that in control subjects in GG genotype of + 45T/G (P = 0.029) and + 276G/T polymorphisms (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION Polymorphisms + 45T/G and + 276G/T of the ADIPOQ gene might not be responsible for OA susceptibility among Thais. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据