4.6 Article

Randomized phase 2 trial of regadenoson for treatment of acute vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease

期刊

BLOOD ADVANCES
卷 1, 期 20, 页码 1645-1649

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017009613

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL098526, P50HL110790]
  2. Astellas Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) agonists have been shown to decrease tissue inflammation induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation in mice with sickle cell disease (SCD). The key mediator of the A(2A)R agonist's anti-inflammatory effects is a minor lymphocyte subset, invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. We tested the hypothesis that administration of an A2AR agonist in patients with SCD would decrease iNKT cell activation and dampen the severity of vaso-occlusive (VO) crises. In a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we administered a 48-hour infusion of the A(2A)R agonist regadenoson (1.44 mu g/kg per hour) to patients with SCD during VO crises to produce a plasma concentration of similar to 5 nM, a concentration known from prior studies to suppress iNKT cell activation in SCD. The primary outcome measure was a >30% reduction in the percentage of activated iNKT cells. Ninety-two patients with SCD were randomized to receive a 48-hour infusion of regadenoson or placebo, in addition to standard-of-care treatment, during hospital admission for a VO crisis and had analyzable iNKT cell samples. The proportion of subjects who demonstrated a reduction of >30% in activated iNKT cells was not significantly different between the regadenoson and placebo arms (43% vs 23%; P = .07). There were also no differences between regadenoson and placebo groups in length of hospital stay, mean total opioid use, or pain scores. These data demonstrate that a low-dose infusion of regadenoson intended to reduce the activity of iNKT cells is not sufficient to produce a statistically significant reduction in such activation or in measures of clinical efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据