4.7 Article

Sources of non-fossil-fuel emissions in carbonaceous aerosols during early winter in Chinese cities

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 18, 页码 11491-11502

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-11491-2017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects [201504010002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41430645, 41473101, 41503092, 41373131]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05040503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China experiences frequent and severe haze outbreaks from the beginning of winter. Carbonaceous aerosols are regarded as an essential factor in controlling the formation and evolution of haze episodes. To elucidate the carbon sources of air pollution, source apportionment was conducted using radiocarbon (C-14) and unique molecular organic tracers. Daily 24 h PM2.5 samples were collected continuously from October 2013 to November 2013 in 10 Chinese cities. The C-14 results indicated that non-fossil-fuel (NF) emissions were predominant in total carbon (TC; average = 65 +/- 7 %). Approximately half of the EC was derived primarily from biomass burning (BB) (average = 46 +/- 11 %), while over half of the organic carbon (OC) fraction comprised NF (average = 68 +/- 7 %). On average, the largest contributor to TC was NF-derived secondary OC (SOCnf), which accounted for 46 +/- 7% of TC, followed by SOC derived from fossil fuels (FF) (SOCf; 16 +/- 3 %), BB-derived primary OC (POCbb; 13 +/- 5 %), POC derived from FF (POCf; 12 +/- 3 %), EC derived from FF (ECf; 7 +/- 2 %) and EC derived from BB (ECbb; 6 +/- 2 %). The regional background carbonaceous aerosol composition was characterized by NF sources; POCs played a major role in northern China, while SOCs contributed more in other regions. However, during haze episodes, there were no dramatic changes in the carbon source or composition in the cities under study, but the contribution of POC from both FF and NF increased significantly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据