4.8 Article

Exceptional High-Performance of Pt-Based Bimetallic Catalysts for Exclusive Detection of Exhaled Biomarkers

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201700737

关键词

bimetallic catalysts; bioinspired catalysts; chemical sensors; exhaled breath analysis; WO3 nanofiber

资金

  1. Wearable Platform Materials Technology Center (WMC) - National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant of the Korean Government (MSIP) [2016R1A5A1009926]
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning as Biomedical Treatment Technology Development Project [2015M3A9D7067418]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [N0002418] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A5A1009926, 2015M3A9D7067502, 2016H1A2A1907718] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Achieving an improved understanding of catalyst properties, with ability to predict new catalytic materials, is key to overcoming the inherent limitations of metal oxide based gas sensors associated with rather low sensitivity and selectivity, particularly under highly humid conditions. This study introduces newly designed bimetallic nanoparticles (NPs) employing bimetallic Pt-based NPs (PtM, where M = Pd, Rh, and Ni) via a protein encapsulating route supported on mesoporous WO3 nanofibers. These structures demonstrate unprecedented sensing performance for detecting target biomarkers (even at p.p.b. levels) in highly humid exhaled breath. Sensor arrays are further employed to enable pattern recognition capable of discriminating between simulated biomarkers and controlled breath. The results provide a new class of multicomponent catalytic materials, demonstrating potential for achieving reliable breath analysis sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据