4.4 Article

Wide versus narrow margins after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Balancing recurrence risk and liver function

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 214, 期 2, 页码 273-277

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.002

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Margins; Recurrence

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The goal of this study was to compare the outcome after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in which a margin less than or equal to 5 mm or greater than 5 mm was achieved. Methods: A review of our 3300-patient prospective HPB database was performed from 12/2002 to 4/2015. Patients were stratified into two groups: resection margins <= 5 (narrow) and > 5 mm (wide) as measured on final pathologic assessment. Results: One-hundred thirty patients were included in the analysis (margin <= 5 mm, n = 41 and margin > 5 mm, n = 89). At the time of analysis 54 patients had developed 56 recurrences, 15 (37%) in the narrow margin group and 41 (46%) in the wide margin group, p = 0.45. The pattern of recurrence was similar in the two groups: intrahepatic 11 (79%) versus 30 (75%), p = 1, and extra-hepatic 6 (43%) versus 17 (43%), p = 1. Median disease-free survival was similar in both groups, 18.1 versus 19.5 months (p = 0.85). Conclusions: A narrow resection margin (5 mm or less) does not detract from oncologic outcomes after partial hepatectomy for HCC. Tailoring resection margins may lead to greater preservation of hepatic parenchyma. Factors other than margin status represent the driving forces for local and systemic recurrence. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据