4.7 Article

Multicomponent equiatomic rare earth oxides with a narrow band gap and associated praseodymium multivalency

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 46, 期 36, 页码 12167-12176

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7dt02077e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Helmholtz Association (Germany)
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [YSS/2015/001712, DST 11-IFA-PH-07]
  3. Fast Track Young Scientist Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New multicomponent equiatomic rare earth oxides (ME-REOs) containing 3-7 rare earth elements (Ce, Gd, La, Nd, Pr, Sm and Y) in equiatomic proportions are synthesized using nebulized spray pyrolysis. All the systems crystallized as a phase pure fluorite type (Fm (3) over barm) structure in spite of the high chemical complexity. A nominal increase in the lattice parameter compared to CeO2 is observed in all ME-REOs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed on the ME-REOs confirmed that all the constituent rare earth elements are present in the 3+ oxidation state, except for Ce and Pr which are present in 4+ and in a mixed (3+/4+) oxidation state, respectively. The presence of Ce4+ contributes substantially to the observed stability of the single phase structure. These new oxide systems have narrow direct band gaps in the range of 1.95-2.14 eV and indirect band gaps in the range of 1.40-1.64 eV, enabling light absorption over the entire visible spectral range. Furthermore, the oxygen vacancy concentration rapidly increases and then saturates with the number of rare earth elements that are incorporated into the ME-REOs. The lowering of the band gap is found to be closely related to the presence of multivalent Pr. Interestingly, the band gap values are relatively invariant with respect to the composition or thermal treatments. Considering the high level of oxygen vacancies present and the observed low band gap values, these new material systems can be of importance where the presence of oxygen vacancies is essential or in applications where a narrow band gap is desirable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据