4.6 Article

Boosting surface charge-transfer doping efficiency and robustness of diamond with WO3 and ReO3

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 111, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4986339

关键词

-

资金

  1. US-Israel Binational Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An advanced charge-transfer yield is demonstrated by employing single monolayers of transitionmetal oxides-tungsten trioxide (WO3) and rhenium trioxide (ReO3)-deposited on the hydrogenated diamond surface, resulting in improved p-type sheet conductivity and thermal stability. Surface conductivities, as determined by Hall effect measurements as a function of temperature for WO3, yield a record sheet hole carrier concentration value of up to 2.52 x 10(14) cm(-2) at room temperature for only a few monolayers of coverage. Transfer doping with ReO3 exhibits a consistent narrow sheet carrier concentration value of around 3 x 10(13) cm(-2), exhibiting a thermal stability of up to 450 degrees C. This enhanced conductivity and temperature robustness exceed those reported for previously exposed surface electron acceptor materials used so far on a diamond surface. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements of the C1s core level shift as a function of WO3 and ReO3 layer thicknesses are used to determine the respective increase in surface band bending of the accumulation layers, leading to a different sub-surface two-dimensional hole gas formation efficiency in both cases. This substantial difference in charge-exchange efficiency is unexpected since both surface acceptors have very close work functions. Consequently, these results lead us to consider additional factors influencing the transfer doping mechanism. Transfer doping with WO3 reveals the highest yet reported transfer doping efficiency per minimal surface acceptor coverage. This improved surface conductivity performance and thermal stability will promote the realization of 2D diamond-based electronic devices facing process fabrication challenges. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据