4.8 Article

H2V3O8 Nanowires as High-Capacity Cathode Materials for Magnesium-Based Battery

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 34, 页码 28667-28673

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09924

关键词

H2V3O8; nanowires; cathode materials; magnesium ions storage; high capacity; hybrid Mg2+/Li+ battery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202603]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934103]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B17034]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521001, 51602239]
  5. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425204]
  6. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016CFB267]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2016III001, 2016III003, 2016IVA090]
  8. Wuhan University of Technology [2016-YS-002]
  9. China Scholarship Council [201606955096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium-based batteries have received much attention as promising candidates to next-generation batteries because of high volumetric capacity, low price, and dendrite-free property of Mg metal. Herein, we reported H2V3O8 nanowire cathode with excellent electrochemical property in magnesium-based batteries. First, it shows a satisfactory magnesium storage ability with 304.2 mA h g(-1) capacity at 50 mA Second, it possesses a high-voltage platform of similar to 2.0 V vs Mg/Mg2+. Furthermore, when evaluated as a cathode material for magnesium-based hybrid Mg2+/Li+ battery, it exhibits a high specific capacity of 305.4 mA h g(-1) at 25 mA g(-1) and can be performed in a wide working temperature range (-20 to 55 degrees C). Notably, the insertion-type ion storage mechanism of H2V3O8 nanowires in hybrid Mg2+/Li batteries are investigated by ex situ X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared. This research demonstrates that the H2V3O8 nanowire cathode is a potential candidate for high-performance magnesium-based batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据