4.6 Review

Imaging tau pathology in Parkinsonisms

期刊

NPJ PARKINSONS DISEASE
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41531-017-0023-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 136778]
  2. Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent development of positron emission tomography radiotracers targeting pathological tau in vivo has led to numerous human trials. While investigations have primarily focused on the most common tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, it is imperative that testing also be performed in parkinsonian tauopathies, such as progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. Tau aggregates differ in isoforms and conformations across disorders, and as a result one radiotracer may not be appropriate for all tauopathies. In this review, we evaluate the preclinical and clinical reports of current tau radiotracers in parkinsonian disorders. These radiotracers include [F-18] FDDNP, [C-11] PBB3, [F-18] THK-5317, [F-18] THK-5351, and [F-18] AV-1451 ([F-18] T807). There are concerns of off-target binding with [F-18] FDDNP and [C-11] PBB3, which may increase the signal to noise ratio and thereby decrease the efficacy of these radiotracers. Testing in [F-18] THK-5317, [F-18] THK-5351, and [F-18] AV-1451 has been performed in progressive supranuclear palsy, while [F-18] THK-5317 and [F-18] AV-1451 have also been tested in corticobasal degeneration patients. [F-18] THK-5317 and [F-18] THK-5351 have demonstrated binding in brain regions known to be afflicted with pathological tau; however, due to small sample sizes these studies should be replicated before concluding their appropriateness in parkinsonian tauopathies. [F-18] AV-1451 has demonstrated mixed results in progressive supranuclear palsy patients and post-mortem analysis shows minimal to no binding to non-Alzheimer's disease tauopathies brain slices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据