4.5 Article

Noise-robust fixation detection in eye movement data: Identification by two-means clustering (I2MC)

期刊

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1802-1823

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0822-1

关键词

Eye-tracking; Fixation detection; Noise; Data quality; Data loss

资金

  1. Consortium on Individual Development (CID)
  2. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [024.001.003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eye-tracking research in infants and older children has gained a lot of momentum over the last decades. Although eye-tracking research in these participant groups has become easier with the advance of the remote eye-tracker, this often comes at the cost of poorer data quality than in research with well-trained adults (Hessels, Andersson, Hooge, Nystrom, & Kemner Infancy, 20, 601-633, 2015; Wass, Forssman, & Leppanen Infancy, 19, 427-460, 2014). Current fixation detection algorithms are not built for data from infants and young children. As a result, some researchers have even turned to hand correction of fixation detections (Saez de Urabain, Johnson, & Smith Behavior Research Methods, 47, 53-72, 2015). Here we introduce a fixation detection algorithm-identification by two-means clustering (I2MC)-built specifically for data across a wide range of noise levels and when periods of data loss may occur. We evaluated the I2MC algorithm against seven state-of-the-art event detection algorithms, and report that the I2MC algorithm's output is the most robust to high noise and data loss levels. The algorithm is automatic, works offline, and is suitable for eye-tracking data recorded with remote or tower-mounted eye-trackers using static stimuli. In addition to application of the I2MC algorithm in eye-tracking research with infants, school children, and certain patient groups, the I2MC algorithm also may be useful when the noise and data loss levels are markedly different between trials, participants, or time points (e.g., longitudinal research).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据