4.7 Article

Facile fabrication of Cu-exchanged ZnS nanoadsorbents for highly efficient removal of contaminants

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.042

关键词

Adsorption; Heavy metal; Ion exchange; Organic dye; Reusability; Waste water

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Korean government [2017-006153, 2015-051798]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu(I)-exchanged ZnS nanoadsorbents having highly efficient adsorption performances toward cationic dyes and heavy metals have been fabricated via facile cation exchange using pristine ZnS nanostructures as templates. Their surface properties such as surface charges and areas have been controlled by adjusting the molar ratio of Cu to Zn(R-Cu/(Zn)). The adsorption efficiency of Cu-exchanged ZnS nanoadsorbents is highest at a R-Cu/(Z)n value of 0.4 because the net surface charges of the nanocomposites resulting from the substitution of Cu(I) ions for Zn(II) ions in the ZnS lattice are electronically most negative. Both the surface areas and the total pore volumes of Cu-exchanged ZnS nanocomposites are also largest at a R-Cu/(Zn) value of 0.4, supporting that Cu-exchanged ZnS (R-Cu/(Zn) = 0.4) nanocomposites have the largest adsorption capacities of cationic dyes. The kinetics and isotherms of adsorption and the effects of various parameters such as concentration, pH, and time on the adsorption process have been also investigated in detail; the adsorption of Cu-exchanged ZnS nanorods shows the Langmuir isotherm model with the maximum capacities of 86.6, 57.0, and 53.1 mg g(-1) for rhodamine B, Co(II), and Ni(II), respectively. The adsorption of cationic dyes to our nanoadsorbents is mainly driven by attractive electrostatic interactions while van der Walls forces also play a role. The composite nanorods have high stability as well in spite of successive reuse. Overall, our prepared Cu-exchanged ZnS nanoadsorbents are suggested to have great potential applicability in the treatment of wastewater containing cationic dyes or heavy metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据