4.8 Article

Lithiophilic Cu-Ni core-shell nanowire network as a stable host for improving lithium anode performance

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 31-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.06.004

关键词

Lithiophilic; Cu-Ni; Core-shell structures; Nanowire network; Li metal anode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21431006, 51571184, 21501165]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21521001]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB931800, 2013CB931800]
  4. Users with Excellence and Scientific Research Grant of Hefei Science Center of CAS [2015HSC-UE007, 2015SRG-HSC038]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH036]
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-M01-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium metal is long-term considered as a promising anode for high energy density lithium batteries. However, the practical application of lithium metal anode is hindered by the poor interfacial stability and lithium dendritic growth, which are originated from the relative infinite volume change of 'hostless' lithium metal anode. Here, we report a highly lithiophilic and stable Cu-Ni core-shell nanowires network host to accommodate the dramatic volume change of lithium and therefore improve the life-span of lithium metal anode. The Ni coating on the Cu nanowire endows the lithiophilic surface of the 3D network host facilitating the formation of the Li-Cu@Ni metallic nanocomposite anode via the facile infusion of molten lithium. The fabricated Li-Cu@Ni metallic anode shows superior electrochemical performance under galvanostatic cycling in the carbonate electrolyte, retaining flat voltage profiles over 500 cycles at a high current density of 3 mA cm(-2) with a low voltage polarization of 140 mV. Furthermore, the Li-Cu@Ni based full cell coupled with the LiCoO2 cathode exhibited good rate capability (similar to 90 mA h/g at 5C) and cycling stability at 5C for 250 cycles (0.015% decay per cycle).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据