4.3 Article

Phenolic Composition of Leaf extracts of Ailanthus altissima (Simaroubaceae) with Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity Equivalent to Standard Antibiotics

期刊

NATURAL PRODUCT COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 1609-1612

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1934578X1701201021

关键词

Antibacterial; Antimicotic; Antioxidant; Flavonoids; HPLC; Phenolic acids; Tree of Heaven

资金

  1. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracts of fresh and dry Ailanthus altissima leaves from Croatia were evaluated for their phenolic composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. The methanolic extract had a higher concentration of total phenolics, flavonoids and non-flavonoids, as well as a higher antioxidant capacity than water extracts. Flavonoids identified in A. altissima leaves belong to two groups: flavones (glycosides of apigenin and luteolin) and flavonols (glycosides of quercetin and kaempferol). They were mainly present as glycosides, quercetin-3-O-glucoside was the predominant flavonoid. Only traces of aglycones were detected even after extract hydrolysis. Caffeic acid was the predominant phenolic acid both before and after hydrolysis, followed by chlorogenic acid after hydrolysis. The concentration of chlorogenic acid significantly increased soon after tissue fragmentation suggesting this compound is involved in rapid response against mechanical wounding in A. altissima. Therefore, to increase the chlorogenic acid concentration, mechanical wounding could be applied. The acetone leaf extract was as active against Escherichia colt as the positive control gentamicin. Both acetone and methanol:dichloromethane extracts had a higher activity against Candida albicans than a standard drug amphotericin B. Therefore, A. altissima could serve as a valuable resource for antimicrobial activity, which makes this species interesting for further investigation and possible pharmaceutical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据