4.7 Article

Short-term effects of a low carbohydrate diet on glycaemic variables and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with type 1 diabetes: A randomized open-label crossover trial

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 1479-1484

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12953

关键词

continuous glucose monitoring; continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; dietary intervention; dyslipidaemia; glycaemic control; hypoglycaemia

资金

  1. Danish Diabetes Academy - Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Danish Diabetes Association
  3. Poul and Erna Sehested Hansen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of a high carbohydrate diet (HCD) vs a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) on glycaemic variables and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with type 1 diabetes. Ten patients (4 women, insulin pump-treated, median +/- standard deviation [s.d.] age 48 +/- 10years, glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 53 +/- 6 mmol/mol [7.0% +/- 0.6%]) followed an isocaloric HCD (>= 250g/d) for 1week and an isocaloric LCD (<= 50g/d) for 1week in random order. After each week, we downloaded pump and sensor data and collected fasting blood and urine samples. Diet adherence was high (225 +/- 30 vs 47 +/- 10g carbohydrates/d; P < .0001). Mean sensor glucose levels were similar in the two diets (7.3 +/- 1.1 vs 7.4 +/- 0.6 mmol/L; P = .99). The LCD resulted in more time with glucose values in the range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L (83% +/- 9% vs 72% +/- 11%; P = .02), less time with values <= 3.9 mmol/L (3.3% +/- 2.8% vs 8.0% +/- 6.3%; P = .03), and less glucose variability (s.d. 1.9 +/- 0.4 vs 2.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/L; P = .02) than the HCD. Cardiovascular markers were unaffected, while fasting glucagon, ketone and free fatty acid levels were higher at end of the LCD week than the HCD week. In conclusion, the LCD resulted in more time in euglycaemia, less time in hypoglycaemia and less glucose variability than the HCD, without altering mean glucose levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据