4.6 Review

Inhibitors of metallo-β-lactamases

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 96-105

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant [FRN-148463]
  2. Canada Research Chair in Antibiotic Biochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The beta-lactams are the most successful class of antibiotic drugs but they are vulnerable to inactivation by a growing cadre of beta-lactamases that now number more than a thousand variants. beta-Lactamases operate by one of two general chemical mechanisms either catalyzing beta-lactam ring hydrolysis via a covalent enzyme intermediate through the aegis of an active site serine residue or through a noncovalent Zn-dependent mechanism. The Ser-beta-lactamases are currently dominant in the clinic and consequently, there has been great effort to identify inhibitors and to co-formulate these with beta-lactam antibiotics. Four such inhibitors are approved for human clinical use and several more are in clinical trials. Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs), on the other hand, are only now emerging as a global threat and consequently, inhibitor discovery has lagged behind their Ser counterparts. There are now several examples of MBL inhibitors that operate either in a Zn-dependent or Zn-independent mode. The Zn-dependent compounds are more prevalent and some show efficacy in animal models of infection. These compounds function by either acting as an alternate metal ligand, usually displacing a jointly held hydroxide ion shared by enzymes with two Zn2+ ions, or alternately by striping Zn from the active site. The increase in the number of candidate MBL inhibitors over recent years reflects the growing clinical challenge of pathogens expressing these enzymes that result in a carbapenem resistance phenotype. While none of these inhibitors are yet in human clinical trials, the increasing importance of these enzymes in drug failure is a strong incentive to continue identifying and characterizing such molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据