4.8 Article

Experimental investigation of the thermal and mechanical stability of rocks for high-temperature thermal-energy storage

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 373-389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.025

关键词

Thermal-energy storage; High temperature; Packed beds; Rocks; Specific heat capacity; Porosity

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [407040_153776]
  2. European Union [642067]
  3. 7th Framework Program (SFERA-II) [312643]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [407040_153776] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  5. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [642067] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six types of rocks of Alpine origin were investigated for their suitability for high-temperature packed-bed thermal-energy storage. The rocks were thermally cycled in laboratory furnaces between about 100 degrees C and 600 degrees C with a heating rate of 2.6 degrees C/min and assessed in terms of their specific heat capacity and porosity as well as the degree of cracking, fracturing, and disintegration. Thermal cycling was found to lead to decreases in the specific heat capacity and increases in the porosity of the rocks. These changes are explained by physical and chemical reactions such as mineral dehydration, deserpentinization, decarbonation, and the quartz-inversion reaction. Simulations of a 23 MWh industrial-scale thermal-energy storage show that the decrease in the specific heat capacity does not have a significant impact on the effective storage capacity, utilization factor, and exergy efficiency. To avoid fracturing of rocks, foliated rocks and rocks rich in calcite and/or quartz, such as limestones and sandstones, are found to be unsuitable when exposed to temperatures higher than about 600 degrees C or 573 degrees C, respectively. Mafic rocks, felsic rocks, serpentinite, and quartz-rich conglomerates are judged to be suitable for high-temperature thermal-energy storage. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据