4.5 Article

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Recurrence of Esophageal Squamous Cell carcinoma

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 2190-2198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4430-8

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10101] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evaluation of treatment outcomes and detection of prognostic factors after recurrence are very important for tailoring optimal therapies for individual patients with recurrent esophageal cancer. We reviewed 133 patients in whom esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) recurred after curative surgery, and assessed recurrence patterns, treatment outcomes and prognostic factors. Recurrence in 57 (42.9%), 54 (40.6%) and 22 (16.5%) patients was locoregional, distant and combined, respectively. The median amounts of elapsed time until recurrence and median survival after recurrence for all patients were 9.1 and 8.3 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses selected time to recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-0.999; p = 0.04), recurrence location (locoregional vs. distant: HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.61; p = 0.04), number of organs with recurrence (1 vs. 3: HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.23-9.87; p = 0.02) and treatment after recurrence (best supportive care, [BSC] vs. chemotherapy [CT] or radiation therapy [RT]: HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94; p = 0.04; BSC vs. CT and RT: HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94; p = 0.03; BSC vs. surgery: HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; p = 0.02) as independent factors for survival after recurrence. Seventeen (12.8%) patients who had localized lymph node recurrence and lung oligometastasis and received multidisciplinary therapy after recurrence survived for > 3 years thereafter. Despite the poor survival of patients with ESCC and early or distant recurrence or recurrence in recurrent organs, appropriate multimodal therapies should be tailored for individual patients with recurrent ESCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据