4.4 Article

Synthesis, characterization, and adsorptive desulfurization behavior of Merrifield resin supported polymeric ionic liquids with different alkyl chain lengths

期刊

COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 295, 期 10, 页码 1863-1871

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-017-4165-y

关键词

Ionic liquid; Polystyrene-supported polymeric ILs; Adsorption; Desulfurization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21603276]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016BL14]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15CX05027A, 16CX05013A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids (ILs) as environmental-friendly extractive solvents can remove aromatic heterocyclic sulfur compounds (S-compounds) from fuel oils, which due to their capacity for S-compounds (easy separation and higher selectivity). In this work, a series of polystyrene (PS)-supported polymeric ILs (PS-PILs or PS-6-PILs) with different alkyl side chain length were synthesized. Characterization with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) demonstrated that IL monomers had been successfully loaded and polymerized on the surface of PS to form a thin polymer coating. The adsorptive desulfurization behavior of polystyrene-supported polymeric ILs was investigated by removing aromatic S-containing compound from model fuel (cyclohexane/thiophene, 2-methylthiophene, benzothiophene, and dibenzothiophene). Under the experimental conditions, the adsorption ability followed the order of PS < PS-PILs < PS-6-PILs. With the length of alkyl chain of imidazole ring increased, the desulfurization rate of thiophene was gradually increased, 2-methylthiophene was first increased and then decreased, benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene were slightly decreased. These trends were due to the different steric effect and aromatic pi-electron density of ILs with different alkyl side chain length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据