4.2 Article

Slc7a11 (xCT) protein expression is not altered in the depressed brain and system xc- deficiency does not affect depression-associated behaviour in the corticosterone mouse model

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 381-392

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1371332

关键词

Depression; glutamate; slc7a11; system xc-; N-acetylcysteine

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [G. 038412N]
  2. Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation
  3. Vrije Universiteit Brussel [SRP40]
  4. agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
  5. FWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The cystine/glutamate antiporter (system xc-) is believed to contribute to nonvesicular glutamate release from glial cells in various brain areas. Although recent investigations implicate system xc- in mood disorders, unambiguous evidence has not yet been established. Therefore, we evaluated the possible role of system xc- in the depressive state. Methods: We conducted a protein expression analysis of the specific subunit of system xc- (xCT) in brain regions of the corticosterone mouse model, Flinders Sensitive Line rat model and post-mortem tissue of depressed patients. We next subjected system xc- deficient mice to the corticosterone model and analysed their behaviour in several tests. Lastly, we subjected additional cohorts of xCT-deficient and wild-type mice to N-acetylcysteine treatment to unveil whether the previously reported antidepressant-like effects are dependent upon system xc-. Results: We did not detect any changes in xCT expression levels in the animal models or patients compared to proper controls. Furthermore, loss of system xc- had no effect on depression- and anxiety-like behaviour. Finally, the antidepressant-like effects of N-acetylcysteine are not mediated via system xc-. Conclusions: xCT protein expression is not altered in the depressed brain and system xc- deficiency does not affect depression-associated behaviour in the corticosterone mouse model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据