4.7 Article

Degradation progress of concrete subject to combined sulfate-chloride attack under drying-wetting cycles and flexural loading

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 164-171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.074

关键词

Concrete; Combined sulfate-chloride attack; Drying-wetting cycles; Short-term loading; Compressive region; Tensile region

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578141]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2015CB6551002]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFE0118200]
  4. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China
  5. Natural National Science Foundation
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental study on the damage progress of concrete subject to combined sulfate-chloride attack under drying-wetting cycles and flexural loading. Two different loading regimes (long-term loading and short-term loading), which contain three different stress levels and both tensile and compressive regions, are applied in this test. The research results indicate that flexural loading accelerates the deterioration of concrete subject to sulfate and chloride attack under dry-wetting cycles. The damage of concrete was increased with the increasing stress level under both long-term loading and short-term loading. Compare to long-term loading, concrete under short-term loading shows slight damage. In the tensile region, loading accelerate the sulfate and chloride attack of the concrete, while in the compressive region, loading improve resistance of concrete against sulfate and chloride attack and this effect is more obvious with the increase of stress levels. It was also found that mineral admixtures, such as fly ash and ground granulated blast slag can improve the resistance of concrete under combined sulfate-chloride attack, with drying-wetting cycles and flexural loading. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据