4.7 Article

Thermal performance of composite porous vapor chambers with uniform radial grooves

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 1334-1344

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.108

关键词

Vapor chambers; Composite wicks; Multi-artery; Thermal resistance

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2015J05112]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Xiamen Universities [20720152002]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project for Industry-University-Research Cooperation in Huizhou City [2014B050013002]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of High-End Equipment Manufacturing in Fujian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a type of composite porous vapor chambers (CPVCs) with uniform radial grooves in the evaporator, providing radial multi-artery channels for the fast liquid backflow with low hydraulic resistance. The separated porous powder parts between adjacent radial grooves were in intimate contact with the condenser porous wick to strengthen the structures of vapor chambers. These CPVCs can be fabricated without solid supporting columns with low cost. A series of CPVCs were fabricated by sintering two types of copper powder with spherical and irregular shapes, and five different particle sizes of <50, 50-75, 75-100, 100-125 and 125-150 mu m. Using the working fluid of ethanol, the thermal performance of these CPVCs were systematically assessed together with the comparison with a pure copper plate. The CPVCs were found to maintain good temperature uniformity. They were able to operate efficiently to high heat fluxes of 280 W/cm(2) without notable performance degradation, and presented the best thermal resistances smaller than 0.15 degrees C/W. The sample with the spherical powder size of 5075 gm was found to be the optimum choice for the CPVCs. Moreover, enhanced thermal performance can be obtained when the heating area increased from 10 mm x 10 mm to 15 mm x 15 mm for the CPVCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据