4.4 Article

Prevalence and nature of cardiovascular disease in methamphetamine-related death: A national study

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 174-179

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.07.001

关键词

Methamphetamine; Mortality; Disease; Cardiovascular; Heart

资金

  1. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
  2. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Methamphetamine dependence is a major public health problem. This study examined the nature, and extent, of cardiovascular disease amongst cases of methamphetamine-related death in Australia, 2009-2015. Methods: Analysis of 894 cases of methamphetamine-related death with full autopsy reports retrieved from the National Coronial Information System. Results: The mean age was 37.9 yrs (range 15-69 yrs) and 78.5% were male. A quarter (26.3%) of cases had enlarged hearts and left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed in 18.9%. Severe coronary artery disease was present in 19.0%, the left coronary artery being the vessel most frequently stenosed (16.6%). Replacement fibrosis (evidence of earlier ischaemic events) in the heart muscle was observed in 19.8% of cases, and cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 5.5%. Histological evidence of hypertension was observed in 32.7% of cases. With the exception of cardiomyopathy, equally common amongst both sexes, cardiovascular disease was more common amongst males, and those aged > 35yrs. Clinically significant levels of cardiovascular disease were also observed amongst cases where the cause of death was not attributed to cardiovascular disease: cardiomegaly (19.3%), left ventricular hypertrophy (14.6%), severe coronary artery disease (9.4%), replacement fibrosis (14.4%), cardiomyopathy (3.3%). Conclusions: Cardiovascular disease was highly prevalent, despite the relatively young age of cases. With methamphetamine use increasing rapidly in major regions, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular-related death will likely increase amongst methamphetamine users.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据