4.6 Article

Oxygen beams for therapy: advanced biological treatment planning and experimental verification

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 19, 页码 7798-7813

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa88a0

关键词

biological treatment planning; hypoxia; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE); cell survival; ion beam radiotherapy

资金

  1. EU project ARGENT [608163]
  2. INFN CSN5 Call 'MoVe IT'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays there is a rising interest towards exploiting new therapeutical beams beyond carbon ions and protons. In particular, O-16 ions are being widely discussed due to their increased LET distribution. In this contribution, we report on the first experimental verification of biologically optimized treatment plans, accounting for different biological effects, generated with the TRiP98 planning system with O-16 beams, performed at HIT and GSI. This implies the measurements of 3D profiles of absorbed dose as well as several biological measurements. The latter includes the measurements of relative biological effectiveness along the range of linear energy transfer values from approximate to 20 up to approximate to 750 keV mu m(-1), oxygen enhancement ratio values and the verification of the kill-painting approach, to overcome hypoxia, with a phantom imitating an unevenly oxygenated target. With the present implementation, our treatment planning system is able to perform a comparative analysis of different ions, according to any given condition of the target. For the particular cases of low target oxygenation, O-16 ions demonstrate a higher peak-to-entrance dose ratio for the same cell killing in the target region compared to C-12 ions. Based on this phenomenon, we performed a short computational analysis to reveal the potential range of treatment plans, where O-16 can benefit over lighter modalities. It emerges that for more hypoxic target regions (partial oxygen pressure of approximate to 0.15% or lower) and relatively low doses (approximate to 4 Gy or lower) the choice of O-16 over C-12 or He-4 may be justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据