4.7 Article

Management of rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrates: a cohort study

期刊

BLOOD
卷 130, 期 15, 页码 1706-1712

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-782060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Octapharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and occurrence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for the management of major bleeding events (MBEs) onrivaroxabanor apixaban. We investigated the effectiveness of PCCs given for the management of MBEs in patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban. Between 1 January 2014 and 1 October 2016, we prospectively included patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban treated with PCCs for the management of MBEs. The effectiveness of PCCs was assessed by using the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee criteria for the assessment of the effectiveness of major bleeding management. The safety outcomes were thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality with in 30 days after treatmentwith PCCs. Atotal of 84 patients received PCCs for the reversal of rivaroxaban or apixaban due to a MBE. PCCs were given at amedian (interquartile range) dose of 2000 IU (1500-2000 IU). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was themost common site of bleeding requiring reversal (n = 5 59; 70.2%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding in 13 (15.5%) patients. Management with PCCs was assessed as effective in 58 (69.1%) patients and ineffective in 26 (30.9%) patients. Most patients with ineffective hemostasis with PCCs had ICH (n 5 16; 61.5%). Two patients developed an ischemic stroke, occurring 5 and 10 days after treatment with PCC. Twenty seven (32%) patients died within 30 days after a MBE. The administration of PCCs for the management of MBEs associated with rivaroxaban or apixaban is effective inmost cases and is associated with a low risk of thromboembolism. Our findings are limited by the absence of a control group in the study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据