4.7 Article

HEROD: a human ethnic and regional specific omics database

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 3276-3282

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx340

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Academic Research Fund [R-148-000-208-112, R-148-000-230-114, R-148-000-239-114]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2013CB967204]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81325021]
  4. Shenzhen Municipal Government [JSGG20141016150327538, 20150113A0410006]
  5. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Genetic and gene expression variations within and between populations and across geographical regions have substantial effects on the biological phenotypes, diseases, and therapeutic response. The development of precision medicines can be facilitated by the OMICS studies of the patients of specific ethnicity and geographic region. However, there is an inadequate facility for broadly and conveniently accessing the ethnic and regional specific OMICS data. Results: Here, we introduced a new free database, HEROD, a human ethnic and regional specific OMICS database. Its first version contains the gene expression data of 53 070 patients of 169 diseases in seven ethnic populations from 193 cities/regions in 49 nations curated from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the ArrayExpress Archive of Functional Genomics Data (ArrayExpress), the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC). Geographic region information of curated patients was mainly manually extracted from referenced publications of each original study. These data can be accessed and downloaded via keyword search, World map search, and menu-bar search of disease name, the international classification of disease code, geographical region, location of sample collection, ethnic population, gender, age, sample source organ, patient type (patient or healthy), sample type (disease or normal tissue) and assay type on the web interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据