4.8 Article

Qualitative differences in T-cell activation by dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicle subtypes

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 36, 期 20, 页码 3012-3028

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201696003

关键词

CD4(+) T cells; dendritic cells; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; microvesicles

资金

  1. French National Research Agency through the Investments for the Future programme [ANR-10-INSB-04]
  2. French National Research Agency through the IDEX programme
  3. French National Research Agency through the Labex programme [ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*, ANR-11-LABX-0043]
  4. Fondation ARC [SL220120605293]
  5. ANRS [2015-1]
  6. NIDA (Johns Hopkins Medical University) [DA040385]
  7. CIC IGR-Curie [1428]
  8. INSERM
  9. Institut Curie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exosomes, nano-sized secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs), are actively studied for their diagnostic and therapeutic potential. In particular, exosomes secreted by dendritic cells (DCs) have been shown to carry MHC-peptide complexes allowing efficient activation of T lymphocytes, thus displaying potential as promoters of adaptive immune responses. DCs also secrete other types of EVs of different size, subcellular origin and protein composition, whose immune capacities have not been yet compared to those of exosomes. Here, we show that large EVs (lEVs) released by human DCs are as efficient as small EVs (sEVs), including exosomes, to induce CD4(+) T-cell activation in vitro. When released by immature DCs, however, lEVs and sEVs differ in their capacity to orient T helper (Th) cell responses, the former favouring secretion of Th2 cytokines, whereas the latter promote Th1 cytokine secretion (IFN-gamma). Upon DC maturation, however, these functional differences are abolished, and all EVs become able to induce IFN-gamma. Our results highlight the need to comprehensively compare the functionalities of EV subtypes in all patho/physiological systems where exosomes are claimed to perform critical roles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据