4.7 Article

Pool boiling performance and bubble dynamics on microgrooved surfaces with reentrant cavities

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 432-442

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.044

关键词

Pool boiling; Heat transfer; Bubble growth; Micro groove; Reentrant cavity

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51475172]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, Science and Technology Planning Project for Industry-University-Research Cooperation in Guangdong Province [2014B090901065, 2016B090918096]
  3. key program of NSFC-Guangdong Joint Funds of China [U1401249]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. Team Program [2014A030312017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microgrooved surfaces with reentrant cavities (MSRCs) were fabricated on pure copper substrates by employing the orthogonal Ploughing/Extrusion (P/E) method. The pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of this enhanced structure at different liquid subcooling degrees were investigated with deionized water as the working fluid at atmospheric pressure. The results indicated that the MSRCs had a higher heat transfer coefficient (HTC) than the smooth copper sheet (SCS) at any liquid subcooling. In addition, the wall superheat at the onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) for the MSRC was lower. Studies on the visualization of bubble growth process were also conducted with a high-speed digital camera, which showed that there were two kinds of bubbles on the MSRC surface depending on the different locations of nucleation sites. i.e., in the reentrant cavities and in micro-grooves. The departure diameter of bubbles that nucleated in the grooves increased with increasing heat flux for q(a) < 465.58 kW/m(2) and then, started decreasing sharply. However, heat flux had little influence on the departure diameter of bubbles growing in the reentrant cavities. Increasing the liquid subcooling temperature reduced the bubble departure diameter while increased the HTC. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据