4.7 Article

The combined effect of heat transfer and skin effect on Joule heating for silicon rod in Siemens reactor

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 856-869

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.072

关键词

Joule heating; Heat transfer; Skin effect; Siemens reactor; High frequency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21566015]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M613281XB]
  3. Applied Basic Research Projects of Yunnan [2015FB126]
  4. NSFC, China
  5. Kunming Yeyan New-Material Co., Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Maxwell's field equations and Ohm's Law were added to energy equation to account for the electromagnetic contributions to heat transfer phenomena within silicon rod arranged in an industrial Siemens reactor. Based on the combined effect of the heat dissipation (radiation, convection and reaction energy), a Joule heating model using alternating current (AC) has been developed. The analysis accounts for the rod radius, location, skin depth, as well as the properties of the polysilicon. The results indicate that high frequency current sources can generate an even temperature profile, and a higher deposition radius can be obtained. Alternating current, having a fixed or variable high frequency in the range of about 2.4 kHz to 500 kHz, is provided to concentrate at least 70% of the current in an annular region that is the outer 15% of a growing rod due to the skin effect. The voltage-current curves have been predicted based on the present model. Finally, a novel Joule heating method useful for producing the larger high-purity poly-crystalline silicon rods by considering the low frequency power and the high frequency power is proposed. It is interesting that the average energy consumption (AE) can be decreased from 55 kWh/kg to about 44 kWh/kg as extending the maximum deposition radius from 7 cm to 10 cm by using a high frequency current source. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据